Kyrgyzstan resilience analysis
Kyrgyzstan ranks #87 of 170 countries with an overall resilience score of 53.5 out of 100. Recovery capacity is the weakest pillar at 60.8, with structural readiness next at 62.5. Live shock exposure is strongest at 75.3, while Recovery capacity is the lowest of the six underlying domains at 60.8. Across the recorded 30-day window, the index is stable at -0.1 points. Dimension coverage is 75%, and the page labels confidence as standard.
Pillar profile
- Recovery capacity: 60.8; coverage 58%; domains Recovery capacity.
- Structural readiness: 62.5; coverage 85%; domains Economic capacity, Social and governance.
- Live shock exposure: 75.3; coverage 85%; domains Infrastructure, Energy security, Health, food and water.
Six-domain profile
- Recovery capacity: 60.8; weight 25%; low Liquid-reserve adequacy 27; high External-debt coverage 84.
- Social and governance: 61.2; weight 19%; low Governance and institutions 34; high Border security 83.
- Economic capacity: 63.7; weight 17%; low Financial-system exposure 48; high Trade policy resilience 85.
- Health, food and water: 65.9; weight 13%; low Health and public services 60; high Food and water security 73.
- Infrastructure: 77.6; weight 15%; low Logistics and supply chains 31; high Cyber and digital capacity 100.
- Energy security: 84; weight 11%; Energy system resilience 84.
Dimension evidence, observed scores weakest first
| Dimension | Domain | Score | Coverage | Evidence state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid-reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | 27 | 100% | Fresh |
| Logistics and supply chains | Infrastructure | 31 | 50% | Fresh |
| Governance and institutions | Social and governance | 34 | 100% | Fresh |
| Financial-system exposure | Economic capacity | 48 | 100% | Fresh |
| Currency and external balance | Economic capacity | 50 | 85% | Fresh |
| Import concentration | Recovery capacity | 55 | 100% | Fresh |
| State continuity | Recovery capacity | 55 | 100% | Stale |
| Health and public services | Health, food and water | 60 | 100% | Fresh |
| Social cohesion | Social and governance | 64 | 92% | Stale |
| Information environment | Social and governance | 68 | 55% | Stale |
| Fiscal space | Recovery capacity | 69 | 65% | Fresh |
| Food and water security | Health, food and water | 73 | 82% | Fresh |
| Macro-fiscal position | Economic capacity | 73 | 95% | Fresh |
| Core infrastructure | Infrastructure | 79 | 70% | Fresh |
| Border security | Social and governance | 83 | 100% | Stale |
| Energy system resilience | Energy security | 84 | 90% | Fresh |
| External-debt coverage | Recovery capacity | 84 | 100% | Fresh |
| Trade policy resilience | Economic capacity | 85 | 100% | Fresh |
| Cyber and digital capacity | Infrastructure | 100 | 100% | Fresh |
| Fuel-stock buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Reserve adequacy | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Unavailable |
| Sovereign fiscal buffer | Recovery capacity | — | 0% | Not applicable |
| Education capacity | Social and governance | — | 30% | Unmonitored |
Comparison set
Nearest ranked peers: Guyana (#86, 53.5), Jordan (#88, 52.9), São Tomé and Príncipe (#85, 53.7), Ecuador (#89, 52.6). Comparisons in Europe: North Macedonia (#84, 53.9), Armenia (#79, 54.1), Belarus (#72, 55.2), Moldova (#71, 55.3), Russia (#99, 51.5). Similar scores do not mean equal conditions.
Tracked crisis context
Kyrgyzstan has no dedicated crisis tracker; the 14 trackers cover selected crises. That is a coverage limit, not a statement about risk.
Reading limits
Scores come from the August 29, 2026 snapshot. Top domain: Energy security, 84. Weak pillars pull the overall score down; read each score alongside its coverage and imputation.
Questions about Kyrgyzstan
What is Kyrgyzstan's resilience score?
Kyrgyzstan scores 53.5 out of 100 in the August 29, 2026 structural snapshot and sits #87 of 170 ranked countries. This is a comparative index, not a crisis probability.
Which resilience pillars are weakest for Kyrgyzstan?
Recovery capacity is lowest at 60.8, followed by Structural readiness at 62.5. Their evidence coverage is 58% and 85%.
Is Kyrgyzstan's resilience score rising or falling?
The 30-day reading is stable, with a change of -0.1 points. It is structural and separate from the live instability monitor.